transmen are not real men

Transmen are not real men, they’re lesbians on steroids

transmen are not real men
Trans ‘men’ are not real men. But I couldn’t stomach any of the pictures of ‘transmen’ for the splash so have this instead.

Transmen are not real men. It has nothing to do with eating quiche, either.

We’ve spent a lot of time on this blog discussing transwomen (it’s one word, by the way, not two.) But as yet, I’ve said very little about transmen. (Again, one word.) Essentially, transmen don’t exist. They are in fact lesbians with a social desire to appear as men. In the classic profile, this was consistent with their sexuality: to attract female partners, they wish to appear to be men. However, this is a social impulse rather than a sexual one.

There is no equivalent amongst females to the transsexual who is, let us state again, a person born male who is attracted to men from childhood and is naturally extremely feminine in every way — so much so that they can never be successful men and are better off transitioning.

The key to understanding this difference is to realise that males can perform in either the male or the female role in sex. That is, they can either penetrate or be penetrated. Transsexuals are fully psycho-sexually and socially inverted: they have brains like women (Rametti et al), they have bodies like women, they have sexual desires like women and they desire to be treated as women in sex — to be penetrated.

transmen not transsexual
Just a reminder, folks: this is a transsexual. She belongs to a unique class of individuals

Gender Identity

So we can show that so-called ‘gender identity’ in transsexuals is a function of sex drive, and this is essentially an inverted male one. This causes a desire for sexual relations with men. A transsexual is always naturally submissive socially — her physique is such that she cannot hope to compete with males. Even if she desired to have female partners, which she doesn’t, this would be a fruitless pursuit for her, because women are attracted to men, by which we mean alpha-males. So a transsexual melds the sexual and social components together to create a persona that is at once sexually submissive and attractive to male partners. (Note: there is significant emasculation desire in this profile but it is principally rewarded through penetration.)

The above explains why transsexualism is more apparent in so-called ‘macho’ societies, where masculine competition, rewarded by sex with females, is most intense. Transsexuals, simply, can have more rewarding sex lives if they turn themselves into sexually attractive women. They cannot hope to attract the kind of men they desire — heterosexual alpha-males — as boys. Such men are immediately ruled out of the competition for sex with women if they are known to have sex with other males.

However, this neat solution only works because the transsexual has a way to simulate a woman’s role in sex: she uses her anus. Most will simply not penetrate men, although this may change if money is involved. Many transsexuals will try to pass themselves off as ‘real girls’ and if their own anecdotes are true, this actually can be done. However this author suspects that the men involved were more than a little complicit in their own ‘deception’.

A female has no penis, surprisingly

Our ‘transman’ is totally incapable of fulfilling the reverse of this sexual role, because she is a female and so has no penis. You need a penis to penetrate; this is how the word comes into being. Transmen cannot be ‘men’ in the way that transsexuals can be women — in bed. Further, there is no distinctive morphology or brain difference.

Remember, our transsexual is not just attracted to men from childhood; she is also, on average, smaller, more lightly built and more neotenous (pretty) than the men in her ethnic group. Transmen are physically no different from any other females.

The other group of ‘transwomen’ that has been thoroughly researched as that of transvestite autogynephiles. Essentially, these are males who find that their masturbatory satisfaction is more intense when they are dressed as women. They are essentially fetishistic cross dressers who ‘fall in love’ with the woman they invent, by cross-dressing and other means. Eventually, rewarded by repeated intense masturbation sessions, this behaviour becomes delusional and the man begins to believe that he ‘really is a ‘real’ woman’ . This is nonsense, of course, and the delusion causes massive damage both to women and transsexuals.

Masochistic emasculation fetish

However, at the heart of it is a masochistic emasculation fetish. These men consider women to be inferior and in emasculating themselves they reward their masochism.

Transvestite autogynephiles are just men in frocks and their bullying, misogynistic, woman-erasing behaviour is scandalous. Worse, they are quintessentially misogynistic. At the root of their behaviour, as with other forms of masochistic emasculation, is a shame at being men. Perhaps they grew up in a religious environment where boys were considered dirty and nasty and masturbation was an act of evil. Perhaps they were intimidated by the people around them into hating their male bodies. There are many stimuli for masochistic fetishes. What they have in common is an absolute obsession with the self, and one’s own sexual satisfaction.

In autogynephilia this sexual satisfaction comes from appearing as a woman while masturbating, but may also include going out in public and being ‘mistaken’ for a woman or group masturbation sessions ‘en femme’ or dressed as women. These may also involve penetrative sex, in which one partner plays the role of man while the other of woman.

So are our transmen of this group?

No. Blanchard could find no evidence whatsoever that there is a ‘female equivalent’ to autogynephilia, and this is consistent with other researchers. All those who claim that there is, actually are using sleight of hand; they are academically and scientifically disingenuous.

Autogynephilia is ‘a man’s propensity to be sexually aroused at the thought or image of himself as a woman.’ Even if, by a little equivocation, we might show that just being a woman causes some women to be sexually aroused, that is not a female equivalent of autogynephilia.

If there were a female equivalent, it would have to be ‘a woman’s propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought or image of herself as a man,’ and that would be autoandrophilia. No convincing research has ever suggested that this exists. Women do not cream themselves if they put on a baggy pair of jeans and a t-shirt or get a shrt haircut.

Gender is not constructed

This is fascinating because it busts two myths in one go: that gender is constructed and that sex and gender are not associated.

Sex drive is not a part of gender; it is a precursor to gender. Transsexuals look like women because they want to be fucked by men, just like all the other girls in their culture, so they adopt the manners and dress of those girls in order to compete. Once in bed, they accommodate men’s penetrative desire through oral and anal sex.

So gender is a direct consequence of sex drive, which in males can lead to transsexualism, and will do so if it is socially enabled.

However, women’s sex drive is not the same as men’s. This should be axiomatic, but is has been obscured for political reasons. Men and women are not the same. We are different. Not better or worse, but different, and we have different sex drives. Men seek to penetrate and women to be penetrated. This is a direct consequence of the physical nature of their sex organs. Transsexuals can transform their anuses into primary sex organs; as males they have both organs of penetration and organs that can be penetrated.


Females do not have organs of penetration; they can only be penetrated. It’s that simple. So how can it be that some women appear to desire to ‘become men’? The answer is not sex drive: they cannot penetrate. Lesbians may use toys and other devices to simulate penetration but they can never ‘become men’ in sex — or at least, not without complex and largely ineffectual surgery.

In fact, what we are seeing is a consequence of the adoption of the ‘two-group’ model, or a bastardised version of it, amongst certain groups in Western culture. I’ll call it ‘snowflake culture’. It is one half of a traditional two-group culture, which we have discussed elsewhere, with all the men taken out. Those left are emasculated ‘beta-males’ in various forms. Interestingly, transsexuals have little or nothing to do with this group, because they actually are, psycho-sexually, women; they like men.

Snowflake culture is animated principally by misandry, the hatred of men, and specifically, white men. Women are the top dogs. It is a matriarchy seen through a glass darkly. Within it, some women seek to become alpha males in order to replace the real males the culture has removed.

Playing the role of men

These are transmen: women who seek to play the role of men within a culture in which real men have been disallowed and any remaining men completely emasculated. They are usually lesbian although some are not. As we have seen, women’s sexuality is much different from men’s. It greatly revolves around other women and the social hierarchy of women within the ‘not-men’ group.

transman not real man
This horror calls herself a ‘trans man’. Actually she’s a confused lesbian with misandry. She is not, in any sense of the word, a man

‘Transmen’ are women who try to arrogate to themselves what they see as ‘privileges’ that men have in the broader culture. However, these ‘privileges’ are illusory and they come at great cost. Men’s behaviour is minutely policed at all times for signs that they might not actually be a part of the ‘men’ group. They are expected to do the most dangerous and onerous tasks in the society. They are expected to be providers and defenders.

The consequences  are drastic. Men live, on average, ten years less than women and they have relatively worse health. They are much more prone to successful suicides. (Though women excel at attention-seeking fake ones that sometimes, tragically, go wrong and they do actually kill themselves.)

Only males can be men and only females can be women.

Transsexuals are a special case that only occurs amongst males, and has been recorded for thousands of years. It appears across all cultures. So-called transmen, today, are actually females who seek the status of men in the broader society; but they don’t  pay the price that men do for it.

Transmen are, literally, lesbians on steroids.

transmen are not real men
This is just your reward for having to look at that last picture. If you got through that without throwing up, you deserve a treat
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2017 Rod Fleming's World

12 thoughts on “Transmen are not real men, they’re lesbians on steroids”

  1. transmen, Lord Willing, are both real and men, however “unconventional” their path to manhood may be. a man with a micropenis would still be a man. a man with damage to his genitals would still be a man. a transwoman, despite any hormonal or anatomical anamolies they may endure, is a woman as, Lord Willing, The Lord Made her. and a transman similarly is a man as The Lord Wills. and there are nonbinary individuals. By His Grace, Lord Willing, transfolk are able to seek medical intervention and His Healing otherwise.

    1. ‘transmen…are both real and men, however “unconventional” their path to manhood may be.’

      Transmen are not men, they are lesbians on steroids. There is in fact only one category of true transsexual: highly feminine male homosexuals who present as women because their sexual desires make them feel like women. The others are all mental disorders.

      As you say, a man with a micropenis is still a man. That is because he has XY chromosomes.

      1. This article is riddled with misinformation and inconsistencies, but I’d just like to address the most glaring issue. Claiming that transmen are lesbians makes little sense due to the fact that many, if not most, transmen are attracted to men.

        1. You have some science to back up your claims? Of course not. So I’ll say to you what I say to every other Snowflake SJW that comes on here with their shit: get some hard evidence and then come back.

          There are some ‘women who identify as men’ who are attracted to men, but they are not transmen. They are a form of female supremacist who seek to dominate men by adopting masculine social roles and appearance. They then predate on gay men, especially feminine ones, who are more like women (because they actually are women, sexually at least). Thus they can satisfy their heteronormative attraction to men while gratifying their resentment for the imaginary ills they think men have done them, by abusing them sexually and romantically. This is an artefact of Snowflake Culture.

          1. Science? No I suppose not. (snip)

            So yet again, you come to the table with opinion and hearsay. See my reply for the rest of your comments, and my rebuttals.

          2. ‘What I do have is firsthand experience interacting with dozens of transmen. As a matter of fact, I do so on a daily basis.’

            In what capacity do you do this? And where do you find all these ‘transmen’? In some liberal arts college?

            ‘I’ve noticed you’ve made a number of assumptions about the people who call themselves trans and they’re motivations for transitioning. ‘

            It’s ‘their’. Tenure eludes you, does it?

            ‘You’ve stated that gay transmen are “a form of female supremacist who seek to dominate men by adopting masculine social roles and appearances.” This is a very grave statement to make about a group of people. What evidence do you have to back this up? As you’ve presented it, it sounds very much like an opinion.’

            What, like the opinion you present? You have a monopoly on that? Further, how can a statement be ‘grave’? A statement is of fact; it is neutral. Further, there is no such thing as a ‘gay transman’. Those who affect to be are women displaying a perverted form of female attraction to men. They are no more ‘gay’ than autogynephilic transwomen are lesbian.

            ‘Also, you’ve made the claim that these individual are “gratifying their resentment for the imaginary ills they think men have done them, by abusing them sexually and romantically.” In what way do you believe they are abusing these men that choose to date/sleep with them?’

            They predate on gay men who want other men as sexual partners, not women with beards.

            ‘Finally, as an anti-feminist, anti-SJW, libertarian,’

            Appeal to authority. I don’t give a fuck what you “identify” as. I am Jesus H Christ and my address is Tomb 666, Golgotha, Jerusalem. Don’t bring that IP shit here and expect sympathy. Bring facts, I’ll listen. But you have not done that, have you?

            ‘I’m not sure where you get off calling me a Snowflake SJW. It’s ironic to say the least. Perhaps you’re making assumptions about a person you know nothing about (again)?’

            Assumptions made on your prior comments and the context — and which I stand by.

            ‘I look forward to your response.’


  2. wow you are unbelievably misinformed – not only do transmen exist and this is backed up in research shown through brainscans and physiological differences – a mirror of mtf ‘homosexual transsexuals’ but so does autoandrophilia, it is less common but plenty of evidence of it out there. Look into ftm crossdreamers.

    1. How nice of you to be so rude. You may expect no mercy. First off, while there has been one study that claimed to find neurological differences in ‘transmen’, it did not control against lesbians and further, the lead researcher, Antonio Guillamon, says “Research has shown that white matter matures during the first 20 to 30 years of life.” In other words, we cannot tell if the changes are behaviourally induced or if the behaviour is neurologically induced. So they remain ‘lesbians on steroids’.

      Further, so-called autoandrophilia has never been shown to exist and the only people touting this BS are AGP apologists like the odious Jack Molay — not his real name, of course — who are seeking legitimacy for their clandestine, crossdressed fetish. Females simply do not have these fetishes, and so-called transmen are female, just as all transwomen are actually male. Blanchard recently reaffirmed: autoandrophilia does not exist.

      However, while there is an argument that so-called ‘transmen’ are equivalent to HSTS male to feminine transsexuals, this fails because of penetration: a male may perform the sexual role of a female because he can be penetrated anally. Females do not have penises, so cannot penetrate. The best they can do is a lesbian muffslurp or maybe a cucumber here or there. That is why ‘transmen’ are, literally, lesbians on steroids. End of story.

      Do pop by again, petal, it’s always nice.

      1. No really, autoandrophilia is a thing. I experience it… (it usually does not involve crossdressing and is instead based on anatomy and role etc)

        (snip repetition of points I have already written 1000 words rebutting)

        And you thought my post was rude? Are you for real? Your whole blog is needlessly offensive (out of ignorance mostly,) to the majority of transexuals.

        1. No, you do not experience autoandrophilia, if that is an inversion of autogynephilia, because 1) AGP is all about crossdressing and b) autoandrophilia does not exist. You ‘transitioned’ for socio-cultural reasons.

          It was rude. I have not anywhere been offensive to transsexuals, one of which you are not, and I think a look at the links page should satisfy you that I may be a few things but I am not ignorant. Nor am I rude, although I do enjoy challenging Politically-Correct bullshit such as you are so fond of.

          Just because you are a Snowflake does not mean you get to make it all up and go unchallenged.

      2. I’m not sure if my other comment went through since I’m on my mobile so I guess I’ll try and retain the key points… I am an autoandrophile – biologically female, I think I know what I get off on thanks. Not like I want to be, I’m trying to find alternative explanations for why I want to look like some guys I find attractive, and fantasise as a guy having sex with men (and occasionally men with hemephroditic bodies. I like feminine/crossdressing men a lot.)

        And here is a blog not from an AGP, from a ‘homosexual transsexual’ as it were, discussing autoandrophilia (and in other entries she talks about gynephilic ftms.)

        Even Blanchard (who is woefully unaware of the extreme minority of autoandrophilics despite the literature still to this day it seems,) accepts that there is a subset of dysphoric females. There is a spectrum of degrees of masculinity too. Just like degrees of feminity on the other side.

        Oh and phalloplasty + strapons are a thing.

        I’m not sold on the ETLE theory, but if it is correct then it’s worth noting female furries exist too..

        Still in a way it’s hilarious, we’ve perfectly slipped under most people’s radars. I guess believe what you want, gay transmen are going to keep transistioning regardless. Between people like you and the crazy feminists who bizarrely share your views on oh so pure women… (except the radfems who are all about ‘internalised misogyny’) We’ll never have to worry about being branded perverts at least like the poor ‘AGP’ I do feel sorry/protective of them in a way.

        1. ‘I am an autoandrophile’

          No, you are a woman

          ‘I want to look like some guys I find attractive, and fantasise as a guy having sex with men (and occasionally men with hemephroditic bodies. I like feminine/crossdressing men a lot.)’

          That would not make you autoandrophilic, if it is taken to mean an inversion of autogynephilia. You are not the object of your own sexual desire.
          ‘And here is a blog not from an AGP, from a ‘homosexual transsexual’ as it were, discussing autoandrophilia (and in other entries she talks about gynephilic ftms.)’

          If you read the blog, you would known that Kay and I are old friends. We don’t always agree.

          ‘Even Blanchard… accepts that there is a subset of dysphoric females.’

          Yes there are. They just are not autoandrophilic, if that is taken to mean a female version of autogynephilia. Their dysphoria has other causes.
          ‘There is a spectrum of degrees of masculinity too. Just like degrees of feminity on the other side.’
          I am not aware of ever having challenged that.

          ‘Oh and phalloplasty + strapons are a thing.’

          Indeed; it is just that that ‘thing’ is not a penis, and using one does not make you a man.

          ‘I’m not sold on the ETLE theory’

          Yet you consider yourself to have an inversion of autogynephilia, which is by definition an Erotic Target Location Error. You are very confused.

          ‘it’s worth noting female furries exist too.’

          Please give us a break. |We’re trying top be serious here.

          ‘Still in a way it’s hilarious, we’ve perfectly slipped under most people’s radars. I guess believe what you want, gay transmen are going to keep transistioning (sic)regardless.’

          There is no such thing as a ‘gay transman’. If transmen exist, they are a form of lesbian.

          ‘Between people like you and the crazy feminists who bizarrely share your views on oh so pure women… (except the radfems who are all about ‘internalised misogyny’)’

          Uh? I am not a critic of transwomen. I just don’t believe we should promulgate touchy-feely lies and obfuscation in the name of New Age Postmodernist obscurantism.

          If you look like a man I will use masculine pronouns and likewise if you look like a woman, I will use feminine ones. I even extend this courtesy when it might choke me, a la Bruce ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner or Justin ‘Riley’ Dennis.

          Male-to-feminine transsexuals exist because they are capable, without surgery, of playing the sexual role of a woman. It would be true to say that they lie at the end of a scale of homosexuality, where the innate femininity of a homosexual man is so strong that to resist it manifests as dysphoria. Homosexual men who present as men just have less dysphoria.

          A ‘transman’ is simply a lesbian on steroids (you do realise that is meant as a pun, I hope), just as an HSTS transsexual is an extreme form of homosexual male. However, you are claiming that your ‘transman’ status comes from an inversion of autogynephilia, but his is not the case.

          An autogynephile is the object of his own sexual desire. This is central. It is the basis of an ETLE, without which, autogynephilia could not exist. But that is not what you describe. Have you ever dressed up as a man and masturbated in front of a mirror?

          I will venture to profile you. I think you are a USican millennial. You consider yourself to be on the left, and sympathise with SJW, possibly even identify as one. You are steeped in Snowflake Culture.

          Fundamental to this culture is the contemporary feminist ideas that men are all rapists, that being male is evil in and of itself and that women should play the dominant role in society.

          You have swallowed the Snowflake myth wholesale, probably for reasons of peer-group conformity. It has led you to believe that you should present in a masculine fashion, to conform to the mores of the social group you are in; to help displace the monstrous real men and replace them with ‘transmen’ — since the typical Snowflake Beta or Omega male is a waste of time and space. Women have to become men, in order to run the patriarchy successfully, don’t they?

          Yet you retain a completely heteronormative sexual desire to men. However, Snowflake culture debases your status if you are a woman who allows a man to penetrate her, but will raise your status if you appear to be a woman who penetrates men. This is because Snowflake culture, while it would never admit it, is as affected by Roman ideas as the rest of us and thinks that a man being anally penetrated has lost all his status to the person who penetrates him.

          So, as a result of the above two factors, you present as a man and want to penetrate men.
          Now all this is fine and dandy, within the context of a culture that is at best debased, but IT IS NOT AUTOANDROPHILIA. This is because, again, if autoandrophilia were actually a thing, you would be principally attracted to YOURSELF, as a MAN. Since you are not, it can’t be autoandrophilia, because no ETLE is involved. QED.

          Are you a transman? I argue that you’re not, at least in a real sense. You are a product of a cultural bubble, which appears to have reached, thankfully, its maximum potential. I should guess that in a few years you’ll desist and become a tomboyish woman. There’s nothing wrong with that.

          ‘We’ll never have to worry about being branded perverts at least like the poor ‘AGP’ I do feel sorry/protective of them in a way.’
          You probably don’t need to overdo the protectiveness of Western AGPs; they’re a pretty hard-nosed bunch.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *